Jennifer manages an
eight-strong security team, working within a major financial
services organisation. The team’s skills are generalist in nature,
and they perform a variety of audit-based work within the company.
They do a small amount of hands-on web application testing, but
Jennifer outsources most of this work to technical specialist
consultants.
The team has recently found that Burp Scanner strongly
complements their own basic testing skills. Using Burp Scanner, the
team are able to take on more of the hands-on testing themselves.
They can now find and fix a lot of common vulnerabilities earlier in
the development lifecycle. Jennifer still uses external specialists
for more difficult tests, but the scope of the outsourced work is
smaller than it was previously.
Within a few weeks of using Burp Scanner, Jennifer’s consulting
costs have fallen by around 15%. Her team is happy to be doing more
hands-on testing, and developing their technical capabilities.
The security consultancy
Martin heads up an independent consultancy employing 15
penetration testers. Around half their work involves web application
testing.
The consultants employ manual testing techniques, supported by an
automated scanner to give them some back-up, especially on larger
applications. Previously, the company has licensed a major
commercial scanner, which met their needs adequately.
Martin and two of his team tried out Burp Scanner, and found that it is actually more effective at finding
bugs than the other scanner. They also found it easier to use, and
much more tailored to penetration testers, giving them direct
control over, and feedback about, the scanning process.
Now the entire team is using Burp all the time. Martin didn’t
renew the license for the other scanner, saving the company tens of
thousands of dollars per year.
The freelance pen-tester
Robert is a highly experienced penetration tester, who has worked
in the industry for nearly a decade. In the last few years, he has
performed contract work for numerous companies, as well as working
full-time for a couple of periods.
Robert prefers to maintain his own set of testing tools, mostly
free and open source ones. He regards the big commercial products as
too expensive and untrustworthy.
Following a friend’s recommendation, Robert gave Burp a try, and
finds that it provides a very effective back-up to his manual
methodology. He
frequently uses Burp Intruder for automating custom attacks, such as fuzzing unusual input validation and exploiting vulnerabilities to
harvest useful data from an application. He has recently found that
Burp Scanner is able to identify numerous input-based bugs
faster than he can find them manually, leaving him to focus his efforts on
issues that require human intelligence to discover.
Robert thinks Burp is cheap, and he is happy to pay the
subscription himself. He always recommends Burp to colleagues who
haven’t yet discovered its benefits.
Copyright (c) 2010 PortSwigger Ltd. All rights reserved. Email us.